A Failure of Principle

So ArenaNet posted a blog entry on the loot system recently. It explains how their system works, and the “core item-related principals that shaped their design”. Unfortunately, the system described doesn’t live up to the principles.

If you take their principle #3 seriously and think players should look the way the want to look, you need a system that doesn’t give incentives to look a way you don’t want to look. Guild Wars 1 does a fairly good job of this. Lord of the Rings Online does an excellent job, with the ability to equip one set of armor for stats and another for appearance. All Guild Wars 2 manages is that players can look the way they want, if they’re willing to pay the cost.

So why did they fail at this? The most obvious explanation is that they wanted the money from selling transmutation stones. While I’m fine with them wanting money, I think this a very poor way to go about it. Sure, they’ll make some money from it, but I don’t believe the best way to make money involves making your game worse. It’s going to cost them some box sales. It may not be much, but I doubt the revenue from the stones is going to be huge either. A LotRO style system would also make inventory space more valuable, potentially making that sell more, and make it easier to sell armor art (if desired). It’s possible they’ll still make more money from transmutation stones – but there’s no way to know that. If I had to bet, I’d go with the one that results in a better game.

Of course, it could be that the obvious explanation is wrong. Maybe they honestly believe the transmutation system makes for a better game. Some of the commentators on the article about the system at Kill Ten Rats make good points about how it could be helpful – Vulturion, in particular.  If that’s the case, it was still an incredible fail to not give any of the principles behind that belief in the article.

Advertisements

3 comments on “A Failure of Principle

  1. Hunter says:

    I think people are tending to jump to conclusions on the subject. We don’t know yet how tstones will work, how much they’ll cost, which armours we want, how often we’ll want to use tstones. Too many unknowns.

    • Peter Hatch says:

      I think we do pretty much know how they work – that was covered in the article. What details do you think were missed?

      Things like how much they cost and how often we’ll want to use them don’t really affect whether or not it is a good system, IMO, just how much it matters whether or not the system is good.

      And we already know everything about the article, and its presentation of the system was awful.

      • Hunter says:

        well they covered it in the follow up, i thought you might be able to get more than one charge out of it, but that seems dismissed. I was also thinking about the UI, or other unknown aspects of how we might get them.

        In runes of magic there were ways to get a very similar item for free just by playing the game, I thought it might be possible in gw2 and they touched on that as well.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s